Research Paper Sporotrichosis


Sporotrichosis is an endemic mycosis caused by the dimorphic fungus Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato. It has gained importance in recent years due to its worldwide prevalence, recognition of multiple cryptic species within the originally described species, and its distinctive ecology, distribution, and epidemiology across the globe. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of the taxonomy, ecology, prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and outbreaks due to S. schenckii sensu lato. Despite its omnipresence in the environment, this fungus has remarkably diverse modes of infection and distribution patterns across the world. We have delved into the nuances of how sporotrichosis is intimately linked to different forms of human activities, habitats, lifestyles, and environmental and zoonotic interactions. The purpose of this review is to stimulate discussion about the peculiarities of this unique fungal pathogen and increase the awareness of clinicians and microbiologists, especially in regions of high endemicity, to its emergence and evolving presentations and to kindle further research into understanding the unorthodox mechanisms by which this fungus afflicts different human populations.

sporotrichosis, epidemiology, taxonomy, Sporothrix, zoonoses


Sporotrichosis, an endemic disease caused by the dimorphic fungus Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato, is prevalent worldwide in tropical and subtropical areas. Patients with this infection usually present with “implantation mycoses” that is caused by transcutaneous trauma through which the fungal conidia enter the host. Such infections may progress into chronic cutaneous, subcutaneous, and/or even deeper infections involving the lymphatics, fascia, muscles, cartilage, and bones. Although sporotrichosis causes considerable morbidity, it is only rarely associated with mortality. The etiological agents thrive in soil and decaying vegetation such as dead wood, sphagnum moss, cornstalks, and hay. Humans usually acquire the infection through traumatic inoculation of the fungus during outdoor activities such as farming, gardening, animal husbandry, and similar occupations [1]. Among dimorphic fungal diseases, sporotrichosis stands out for the following distinctive characteristics: despite being an endemic fungal disease, its endemicity is widespread; the etiological agents are widely distributed in the environment; it is the only infection caused by a dimorphic agent in which the pulmonary system is not the major route of infection; its ecology, epidemiology, and clinical features vary across different geographical regions; and it is the only dimorphic fungal disease that seems to have substantial zoonotic transmission.

Sporotrichosis has emerged as a major fungal infection over the last two decades due to changes emerging in epidemiology, distribution, taxonomic evolution, and multiple outbreaks. Here, we present a treatise on the present status and global epidemiology of sporotrichosis.

Etiological agent and taxonomy

Ever since its isolation by Benjamin Schenck in 1898, the taxonomic position of Sporothrix species has remained an enigma. Smith, a mycologist, identified the fungus isolated by Schenck as “Sporotricha” [2], and Howard confirmed its dimorphic nature in 1961 [3]. In 1962 Carmichael distinguished it from the basidiomycetous fungal group and classified it under Sporotrichum by identifying the septum and woronin body characteristic of this group [4]. The fungus was eventually named Sporothrix schenckii, and Guarro et al. classified the fungus under division Ascomycota, class Pyrenomycetes, order Ophistomatales, family Ophistomataceae [5]. While no sexual stage has yet been identified, molecular analysis of the 18s region of ribosomal DNA suggests that Ophiostoma stenoceras may represent its sexual form [6]. However, further examination of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics refuted such a possibility, though a sexual stage within the genus Ophiostoma was not ruled out [7].

In 1979 Kwon-Chung first reported the heterogeneity of Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato strains. She noted that the isolates from lymphocutaneous and fixed cutaneous (Fig. 1a, b) forms of disease differed in their growth at 37°C and virulence in animal models [8]. However, this heterogeneity was better established by subsequent mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA analyses. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of different gene targets [9,10], random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, DNA sequencing of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of ribosomal DNA [11,12], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [13], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of DNA topoisomerase II gene [14], and M13 PCR fingerprinting of S. schenckii isolates corroborated the heterogeneity noted earlier [15]. Based on phylogeny of DNA and rDNA types, isolates were clustered into the following two groups: group A comprising most of the isolates from the United States and Latin America and group B comprising Asian isolates [9]. However, Marimon et al. [16,17] described six species based on sequence analysis of three protein-encoding loci (chitin synthase, ß-tubulin, and calmodulin) and phenotypic characteristics (morphology of conidia; growth at 30°C, 35°C, and 37°C; and assimilation of sucrose, raffinose, and ribitol). Three were clinically relevant cryptic species under S. schenckii (S. brasiliensis, S. globosa, S. luriei) and two environmental fungi (S. mexicana and S. albicans), with the original S. schenckii now known as S. schenckii sensu stricto. Sporothrix species differ in their geographical distribution. Sporothrix globosa is distributed worldwide and has been recovered from clinical specimens in Europe (the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy), the United States, South America (Mexico, Guatemala, Columbia), and Asia (India, China, Japan). A recent study from China described two clades for S. globosa [18]. Similarly, S. schenckii sensu stricto has wide geographical distribution and has been isolated from the Americas (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Columbia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, the United States, Venezuela), Europe (France, Italy, the United Kingdom), Africa (South Africa), and Asia (Japan). Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto is also classified into two clades, wherein clade IIa represents a homogenous clade that includes isolates from South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Columbia, Peru) and North American isolates. Clade IIb isolates, on the other hand, are geographically restricted to South America, particularly Peru and Argentina. Isolates from Asia and Africa have not been evaluated [19]. Sporothrix brasiliensis is an emerging species restricted to Brazil and is highly pathogenic to humans and animals [20]. Sporothrix luriei has been described from three human infections in Africa [21], Italy [22], and India [23] and a canine infection in Brazil [24]. Sporothrix mexicana has been recovered from the environment in Australia, Mexico, and Portugal and has been reported to cause occasional human infections [20]. Recently, a study of 124 isolates identified as Sporothrix (n = 99) and Ophiostoma (n = 25) species [25] elucidated the global distribution pattern of clinically important Sporothrix species (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Different clinical presentations of sporotrichosis. (a) Lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis, (b) fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis, (c) ulcerating lesions in a patient who slept with her cat, (d) oro-labial sporotrichosis in a patient who kissed her cat.

Figure 1.

Different clinical presentations of sporotrichosis. (a) Lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis, (b) fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis, (c) ulcerating lesions in a patient who slept with her cat, (d) oro-labial sporotrichosis in a patient who kissed her cat.

Citation: Almeida-Paes R, de Oliveira MME, Freitas DFS, do Valle ACF, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC (2014) Sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Sporothrix brasiliensis Is Associated with Atypical Clinical Presentations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(9): e3094.

Editor: Joseph M. Vinetz, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, United States of America

Received: February 5, 2014; Accepted: July 3, 2014; Published: September 18, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Almeida-Paes et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [E-26/110.619/2012 and E-26/103.157/2011 to RMZO], Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [350338/2000-0 to RMZO], Papes/FIOCRUZ - Papes VI(APQ)[407693/2012-2 to RMZO], and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [2445/11-5 to MMEdO]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Sporotrichosis is a subcutaneous mycosis with a worldwide distribution that is currently notable for areas of especially high endemicity in Latin America [1]–[3]. Some authors classify sporotrichosis as an implantation mycosis, because this infection may also involves other sites beyond the skin and the subcutaneous tissues, such as lymphatic vessels, muscles, fascia, cartilage, and bones [3]. Historically, sporotrichosis has been attributed to a single species, Sporothrix schenckii[1]. However, phenotypic and genotypic analyses by Marimon and coworkers [4] have led to the identification of four new species in the Sporothrix complex: (i) S. globosa, a globally distributed fungus [5]–[7]; (ii) S. brasiliensis, the species related to the zoonotic epidemic of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [8]; (iii) S. mexicana, initially limited to Mexico [4], but with recent cases reported in other regions [9], [10]; and (iv) S. luriei, formerly S. schenckii var. luriei[11].

Classical infection is associated with traumatic subcutaneous inoculation of soil, plants, or organic matter contaminated with fungus, with rare cases of transmission occurring from infected animals [1]. However, in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, sporotrichosis is currently largely occurring via transmission from infected cats to humans [12]. Recently, our group performed a georeferencing survey of sporotrichosis cases that revealed a transmission belt along the border between Rio de Janeiro city and adjacent counties in the Greater Metropolitan Area [13]. Genotypic analyses have shown that isolates from the Rio de Janeiro epidemic have a high genetic similarity, which is suggestive of a common niche [14], [15].

Although some studies have described several clinical aspects of this epidemic [12], [16], [17], taxonomic analyses have not been correlated with disease presentations. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to investigate a possible association between manifestations of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro and the different genomic species of S. schenckii sensu lato.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), under the number CAAE-0024.0.009.000-10. All patient samples and data were analyzed anonymously after receiving a random number during database construction.


A cross-sectional study was performed in 50 patients with different clinical forms of sporotrichosis. They were selected from a database of 246 patients [8] who had Sporothrix strains isolated from clinical specimens and stored at the Pathogenic Fungal Collection of the Laboratório de Micologia at IPEC, and which were part of a cohort of 1,563 patients with sporotrichosis treated from 1999 to 2008 at the Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas (IPEC). Patients were submitted to a protocol that included clinical evaluation, mycological examination of clinical specimens and blood tests (blood count, biochemistry and liver function). In the absence of disseminated disease, oral itraconazole 100 mg/day was prescribed. Higher intraconazole doses were used if the lesions worsened or remained unchanged after eight weeks. The duration of treatment was determined by clinical cure (lesion healing defined as epithelization and absence of crusts, infiltrates, or erythema). Clinical cure of extracutaneous sites was defined as the disappearance of preexisting lesions in cases of conjunctival, nasal, or oral mucosa involvement. Patients with disseminated sporotrichosis received amphotericin B at a total dose of 1–2.5 g. Follow-up was 4–12 weeks after clinical cure. The data were collected by review of medical charts and were recorded on a standardized case report form, containing demographic, epidemiologic, clinical and follow-up information. Since the Rio de Janeiro sporotrichosis outbreak is massive, we had to establish some criteria to select patients related to common and unusual manifestations of sporotrichosis. Inclusion criteria for selection in this study were: patients who lived in Rio de Janeiro city or in other cities from Rio de Janeiro state in Brazil, patients with common (fixed cutaneous and lymphocutaneous) and unusual (disseminated cutaneous, extracutaneous, and disseminated) clinical forms of sporotrichosis [1], patients with and without hypersensitivity manifestations (eythema nodosum or erythema multiforme), patients co-infected with HIV, and patients treated with itraconazole as well as patients with spontaneous regression of lesions. However, for the less common variables (e.g., patients outside the endemic area), all available cases were included.


The fungal isolates were cultured from different body sites, such as skin, eyes, nose, or cerebrospinal fluid. Each isolate was previously identified by classical microbiological phenotypic techniques as S. schenckii sensu lato. Additionally, control strains CBS 120339 (S. brasiliensis) [4], ATCC 16345 (S. schenckii), IPEC 27135 (S. globosa) [7], and MUM 11.02 (S. mexicana) [9] were included in identification tests.

Phenotypic Characterization

Filamentous fungal colonies for each isolate were grown on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and slide cultures were mounted with Lactophenol Cotton Blue (Fluka Analyted, France) for Sporothrix identification [4]. Dimorphism was demonstrated by conversion to the yeast-like form on Brain Heart Infusion Agar slants for 7 days at 37°C. Furthermore, colonies were sub-cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar plates and Corn Meal Agar slants, and incubated at 30 and 37°C in the dark to study fungal growth and sporulation respectively [4], [8]. Carbohydrate assimilation tests were performed using freshly prepared yeast nitrogen base (YNB) medium supplemented with sucrose or raffinose, using YNB supplemented with glucose as positive control and YNB without carbohydrates as a negative control. Experiments were performed at least three times on different days and, in the case of discordant results, repeated two additional times. All culture media were from Difco (Becton, Dickinson and Company/Sparks MD, USA). Results were interpreted according to the identification key detailed by Marimon and coworkers [11].

Molecular Identification

Genomic DNA was extracted and purified from Sporothrix spp mycelial phase by chloroform/isoamyl alcohol method as described [7]. The gene encoding for the nuclear calmodulin was used for molecular differentiation of the isolates because this locus has a high number of parsimony informative sites, allowing Sporothrix differentiation in several genotypes [18]. For partial sequencing of the nuclear calmodulin (CAL) gene, we used the primers CL1 (5′-GA(GA)T(AT)CAAGGAGGCCTTCTC-3′), and CL2A (5′-TTTTTGCATCATGAGTTGGAC-3′) under previously described conditions [7]. Automated sequencing was done using the Sequencing Platform at PDTIS/FIOCRUZ, Brazil [19]. Sequences from both DNA strands were generated and edited with the Sequencher ver. 4.6 software package (Genes Codes Corporation, USA), followed by alignment with Mega version 4.0.2 software. Our sequences were compared by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) with sequences available from NCBI GenBank (Sporothrix AM 398382.1/AM 398393.1/AM 117444.1/AM 116899.1/AM 116908.1). All phylogenetic analyses were performed as previously described [7], [8].

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

All sequences from isolates included in genotypic analysis were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers GU456632, HQ426928 to HQ426962, and KC463890 to KC463903.


Data were processed and analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 software. Frequencies and median values were calculated for each group of this study.



Of the 50 patients, 16 were male and 34 female, with ages ranging from 9 to 83 years (median = 47). Lesions were located at upper limbs (n = 31, 62%), lower limbs (n = 6, 12%), face (n = 1, 2%), trunk (n = 1, 2%), and more than one segment (n = 11, 22%). Fifteen patients (30%) presented with a fixed cutaneous form, 24 (48%) lymphocutaneous form, 6 (12%) disseminated cutaneous form, and 5 (10%) disseminated (involving internal tissues) sporotrichosis. Additionally, six of these patients also presented with erythema nodosum and four with erythema multiforme. Table 1 summarizes the clinical and mycological information for each patient.

Mycological and Phenotypic Identification

Of the 50 strains, 45 (90%) were classified by molecular methods as S. brasiliensis and 5 (10%) as S. schenckii. In 21 (42%) isolates, results from phenotypic tests were inconclusive, precluding species differentiation; these strains were phenotypically classified as Sporothrix spp. Interestingly, phenotypic identification of 10 (20%) isolates did not match to the genotypic results. Eight (16%) strains phenotypically classified as S. schenckii, DNA sequencing clustered them amid S. brasiliensis. The strain phenotypically classified as S. mexicana was genotypically identified as S. schenckii, and one S. brasiliensis was classified as S. schenckii by CAL sequencing.

Mycological, Clinical and Epidemiological Data

Forty-two (93.3%) of the strains identified taxonomically as S. brasiliensis were from the Rio de Janeiro endemic area of sporotrichosis, including Rio de Janeiro city, Duque de Caxias, Belford Roxo, Sao João de Meriti, Nova Iguaçu, Nilópolis, and Mesquita (Fig. 1). The other three (6.7%) S. brasiliensis strains were isolated from patients who lived in Teresópolis, a county 91 km away from Rio de Janeiro city. S. brasiliensis was isolated from 32 of 34 women (94%). Forty (88.9%) patients with S. brasiliensis had documented contacts with cats. Two additional S. brasiliensis-infected patients (4.4%) reported plant and glass trauma preceding the development of sporotrichosis.

Figure 1. Map of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.

Names of the cities of origin of the 50 patients included in this study are indicated. Cities in gray, which comprise the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area, are related to the zoonotic endemic area of sporotrichosis.

With respect to the five patients with S. schenckii, four of them (80%) were isolated from patients who lived in three different rural regions and one urban area (in Itaboraí, Barra do Piraí, Casimiro de Abreu, and Teresópolis, respectively; 45, 100, 127, and 91 km away from Rio de Janeiro city), which are outside of the endemic area. S. schenckii was also isolated from a patient who lived within the zoonotic endemic sporotrichosis area in Rio de Janeiro. Three patients were male and two female.

Hypersensitivity reactions such as erythema nodosum or erythema multiforme (10 cases), disseminated cutaneous forms (6 cases), and all but one case of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis were all attributed to infection with S. brasiliensis. Localized cutaneous forms were observed in patients infected with either S. brasiliensis (n = 12, 26.7%) or S. schenckii (n = 3, 60%). Disseminated disease occurred due to S. schenckii in one patient with AIDS, S. brasiliensis in two patients with AIDS, and S. brasiliensis in one patient without any history of immunosuppression. Finally, there was one case of fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis in a HIV infected patient with CD4>200 cells/µL.

Response to Therapy

Four patients infected with S. brasiliensis were lost to follow-up. The three patients with AIDS and disseminated disease were excluded from analysis since they received amphotericin B as part of their antifungal regimen. Spontaneous regression was observed in one patient infected with S. schenckii (fixed form) and three with S. brasiliensis (two fixed and one disseminated cutaneous forms). The remaining 3 cases of S. schenckii required more than 24 weeks of itraconazole, and two of them required increased doses (200 and 400 mg/day). Most of the 35 patients infected by S. brasiliensis included in this analysis (82.9%) resolved with less than 24 weeks of treatment, regardless of their clinical form. For eight S. brasiliensis-infected patients, up to 400 mg/day itraconazole were necessary for clinical cure. The median time to cure for patients with hypersensitivity reactions was similar to the patients without these manifestations (16 weeks), and their diseases resolved with 100 mg/day of itraconazole.


The clinical presentations of sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix spp are highly variable and poorly understood. Kong and collaborators [20] have demonstrated that S. schenckii genotypes can be correlated with clinical forms of disease, as mice challenged with S. schenckii isolates from patients with fixed cutaneous, lymphocutaneous or disseminated sporotrichosis developed more severe disease according to the severity of the manifestations in the originating patient. However, they did not define the relationships between genotype and treatment outcome or other unusual manifestations. In the present work, we show the direct association between unusual clinical presentations of human sporotrichosis with infection by S. brasiliensis. Although S. brasiliensis caused typical manifestations of fixed cutaneous and lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis, all 10 patients with hypersensitivity reactions and 6/7 patients with disseminated disease were infected with S. brasiliensis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that demonstrates an association between genotypic identification of Sporothrix species and several clinical aspects of human sporotrichosis. Given the recent changes in the nomenclature and advances in the molecular taxonomy of Sporothrix, it is even more important to understand the clinical implications of these advances [21].

As expected, the majority of our isolates have been identified as S. brasiliensis by DNA analyses. Our group has previously characterized S. brasiliensis in 230 (93.5%) of 246 isolates obtained from this endemic zoonotic transmission area [8]. A study by Marimon and coworkers of 127 Sporothrix strains collected from several parts of the world reported only S. brasiliensis among the tested isolates from Rio de Janeiro [4]. There are also a few reports of S. brasiliensis in Brazilian states other than Rio de Janeiro [10], [22], [23], but, in these states, the frequency of S. brasiliensis appears to be lower than that for the other Sporothrix species, with S. schenckii predominating [22].

As noted above, S. brasiliensis genotype caused typical clinical forms of sporotrichosis (lymphocutaneous and fixed cutaneous). However, except for 1 case of disseminated S. schenckii in a patient with AIDS, all of the unusual clinical forms of sporotrichosis were attributed to infection with S. brasiliensis, including disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis in the absence of an underlying immunosuppressive condition, mucosal involvement affecting nasal cavity or conjunctiva, and hypersensitivity reactions. Regarding the hypersensitivity manifestations, our finding are consistent with the previously reported cases of erythema nodosum and erythema multiforme associated with zoonotic sporotrichosis [24], [25] due to S. brasiliensis. Recently, Sweet syndrome has also described in 3 patients with sporotrichosis [26], and studies are underway to determine, by calmodulin sequencing, the species involved in these cases.

Another interesting finding for disease due to S. brasiliensis is the 32/13 female/male ratio, since there is a predominance of male over female patients with sporotrichosis caused by S. schenckii. This can be explained by the fact that the most affected group in the endemic area of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro are housewives that interact with or take care of S. brasiliensis infected cats [1].

Barros and coworkers [27] studied the effects of itraconaozle treatment on cutaneous sporotrichosis in 645 patients from the Rio de Janeiro epidemic, including 87 patients with erythema nodosum or erythema multiforme. Interestingly, they observed that of the patients with hypersensitivity reactions resolved their disease more rapidly compared with patients without these conditions. Although our current study did not find differences regarding treatment between these groups, we did determine that most patients with hypersensitivity reactions presented with fixed cutaneous sporotrichosis. Hence, we believe that hypersensitivity reactions may indicate a robust host response to the S. brasiliensis yeast cells and play a protective role in sporotrichosis, as observed in coccidioidomycosis [28].

The small number of S. schenckii cases in our study calls our attention to the infection caused by this species in Rio de Janeiro. The majority of these cases occurred in rural counties where inhabitants are engaged in agricultural activities, and, therefore, they have frequent and protracted contact with soil. Moreover, in two of these cases, patients denied cat contact. However, S. schenckii was identified in one case from the endemic zoonotic transmission area. Our results suggest that S. schenckii also circulates, in minor proportions, in this endemic area. New studies with a large number of S. schenckii infected patients are necessary to verify the clinical meaningful of sporotrichosis caused by this species.

Several factors could influence the different outcomes of sporotrichosis, such as the size of initial inoculum, the host immune response status, depth of traumatic inoculation and fungal virulence [29]. Virulence studies in a mouse infection model have shown that S. brasiliensis is significantly more lethal and results in higher fungal burdens compared to S. schenckii as well as other examined Sporothrix spp. [30]. This same study concludes that lesional mechanisms could be species-specific, which supports our results. Zoonotic transmission of sporotrichosis by cats results in high Sporothrix inoculums for humans, since these animals have high fungal burdens [31]. In some of the endemic sporotrichosis cases, fungal inoculation is presumably repetitive, due to constant bites and scratches suffered by owners [32]. These factors, coupled with the purported higher virulence of S. brasiliensis[30], could account for the unusual and more severe clinical manifestations observed with this species.

Itraconazole is the drug of choice for sporotrichosis treatment [27]. It is interesting to note that, regardless the clinical form, there was a trend toward shorter treatment durations in patients with sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis, (median = 16 weeks) than the cases due to S. schenckii (median = 24 weeks), for our study. Although we are comparing 46 cases of S. brasiliensis to only 4 infections due to S. schenckii, we propose that our finding might have a therapeutic implication. The response of S. brasiliensis to treatment is consistent with the fact that S. brasiliensis is more susceptible to antifungal drugs, such as itraconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole, than S. schenckii[33]. Moreover, previous results of our group, which included eight S. brasiliensis from this study, showed that strains from the zoonotic endemic area were highly susceptible to itraconazole [14]. Nevertheless, clinical, randomized studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

Since different Sporothrix species appear to be related to distinct clinical manifestations and treatment responses, we propose that speciation should become standard laboratory practice. However, it will require a significant effort to make this recommendation a reality in most clinical laboratories. Phenotypic fungal identification is easier than molecular methods to routinely apply. However, in the present work as well as in a previous study from our team [8] and studies from other groups [10], phenotypic description too often fails to be corroborated by genotypic results. Since the differences between the species of the S. schenckii complex were observed at the molecular level [18], we considered DNA sequencing as the gold standard on species identification for the present study. Unfortunately, at present, DNA sequencing is not a suitable methodology for routine clinical laboratories. We recently described a simple and reliable T3B DNA fingerprinting methodology to identify the S. schenckii species complex at the DNA level [34], making it an alternative identification methodology for clinical microbiology laboratories.

Our study intended to perform a molecular analysis of the most peculiar clinical cases that we observed in this epidemic as well as typical cases, and also patients presenting from areas outside the sporotrichosis belt of zoonotic transmission, which corresponds to almost 20% of our stored samples. We have checked the medical data from the other 196 patients and they were very similar to the cases we included here. The small size of genotyped strains is a weakness of this study, but in our opinion, these cases illustrate the association of S. brasiliensis to the unusual presentations of sporotrichosis. Also, molecular genotyping with sequencing of the calmodulin gene is laborious and expensive (at present), with significant financial impact in our severely limited funding situation.

In conclusion, we have used molecular analysis to clearly demonstrate that S. brasiliensis is the primary cause of endemic sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro state. Moreover, S. brasiliensis causes both classic and unusual manifestations of sporotrichosis, including severe disease in otherwise immunocompetent individuals. We also have documented that local and invasive S. brasiliensis disease responds well to itraconazole therapy, with shorter durations of therapy compared to the patients studied with sporotrichosis caused by S. schenckii. This study adds new information to our knowledge base on S. brasiliensis disease and supports the careful speciation of Sporothrix isolates to guide clinical care.


The authors thank Dr. Joshua Nosanchuk for his editorial assistance. Automated sequencing was done using the genomic platform/DNA sequencing platform at Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - PDTIS/FIOCRUZ (RPT01A), Brazil.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RMZO MCGG. Performed the experiments: RAP MMEdO DFSF ACFdV MCGG. Analyzed the data: RAP MMEdO RMZO MCGG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RMZO. Wrote the paper: RAP MCGG.


  1. 1. Barros MBL, Almeida-Paes R, Schubach AO (2011) Sporothrix schenckii and Sporotrichosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 24: 633–654.
  2. 2. Conti Diaz IA (1989) Epidemiology of sporotrichosis in Latin America. Mycopathologia 108: 113–116.
  3. 3. Queiroz-Telles F, Nucci M, Colombo AL, Tobon A, Restrepo A (2011) Mycoses of implantation in Latin America: an overview of epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment. Med Mycol 49: 225–236.
  4. 4. Marimon R, Cano J, Gene J, Sutton DA, Kawasaki M, et al. (2007) Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3198–3206.
  5. 5. Cruz R, Vieille P, Oschilewski D (2012) Aislamiento ambiental de Sporothrix globosa en relación a un caso de esporotricosis linfo-cutánea. Rev Chilena Infectol 29: 401–405.
  6. 6. Madrid H, Cano J, Gene J, Bonifaz A, Toriello C, et al. (2009) Sporothrix globosa, a pathogenic fungus with widespread geographical distribution. Rev Iberoam Micol 26: 218–222.
  7. 7. Oliveira MME, Almeida-Paes R, Muniz MM, Barros MBL, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, et al. (2010) Sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix globosa in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: case report. Mycopathologia 169: 359–363.
  8. 8. Oliveira MME, Almeida-Paes R, Muniz MM, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Zancope-Oliveira RM (2011) Phenotypic and molecular identification of Sporothrix isolates from an epidemic area of sporotrichosis in Brazil. Mycopathologia 172: 257–267.
  9. 9. Dias NM, Oliveira MME, Santos C, Zancope-Oliveira RM, Lima N (2011) Sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix mexicana, Portugal. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 1975–1976.
  10. 10. Rodrigues AM, de Hoog S, Camargo ZP (2013) Emergence of pathogenicity in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Med Mycol 51: 405–412.
  11. 11. Marimon R, Gene J, Cano J, Guarro J (2008) Sporothrix luriei: a rare fungus from clinical origin. Med Mycol 46: 621–625.
  12. 12. Freitas DFS, Valle ACF, Almeida Paes R, Bastos FI, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC (2010) Zoonotic Sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a protracted epidemic yet to be curbed. Clin Infect Dis 50: 453.
  13. 13. Silva MB, Costa MM, Torres CC, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Valle ACF, et al. (2012) Esporotricose urbana: epidemia negligenciada no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 28: 1867–1880.
  14. 14. Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Valle ACF, Almeida-Paes R, Tavares PMS, et al. (2008) Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Sporothrix schenckii isolates from a cat-transmitted epidemic of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Med Mycol 46: 141–151.
  15. 15. Reis RS, Almeida-Paes R, Muniz MM, Tavares PMS, Monteiro PCF, et al. (2009) Molecular characterisation of Sporothrix schenckii isolates from humans and cats involved in the sporotrichosis epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104: 769–774.
  16. 16. Barros MBL, Schubach AO, Schubach TMP, Wanke B, Lambert-Passos SR (2008) An epidemic of sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: epidemiological aspects of a series of cases. Epidemiol Infect 136: 1192–1196.
  17. 17. Barros MBL, Schubach TMP, Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Schubach AO, Monteiro PCF, et al. (2001) Sporotrichosis: an emergent zoonosis in Rio de Janeiro. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 96: 777–779.
  18. 18. Marimon R, Gene J, Cano J, Trilles L, Lazera MS, et al. (2006) Molecular phylogeny of Sporothrix schenckii. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3251–3256.
  19. 19. Otto TD, Vasconcellos EA, Gomes LH, Moreira AS, Degrave WM, et al. (2008) ChromaPipe: a pipeline for analysis, quality control and management for a DNA sequencing facility. Genet Mol Res 7: 861–871.
  20. 20. Kong X, Xiao T, Lin J, Wang Y, Chen HD (2006) Relationships among genotypes, virulence and clinical forms of Sporothrix schenckii infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 12: 1077–1081.
  21. 21. de Hoog GS, Haase G, Chaturvedi V, Walsh TJ, Meyer W, et al. (2013) Taxonomy of medically important fungi in the molecular era. Lancet Infect Dis 13: 385–386.
  22. 22. Oliveira DC, Lopes PG, Spader TB, Mahl CD, Tronco-Alves GR, et al. (2011) Antifungal susceptibilities of Sporothrix albicans, S. brasiliensis, and S. luriei of the S. schenckii complex identified in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 49: 3047–3049.
  23. 23. Silva-Vergara ML, Camargo ZP, Silva PF, Abdalla MR, Sgarbieri RN, et al. (2012) Disseminated Sporothrix brasiliensis infection with endocardial and ocular involvement in an HIV-infected patient. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86: 477–480.
  24. 24. Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Barros MBL, Schubach AO, Cuzzi T, Schubach TMP, et al. (2005) Erythema multiforme associated with sporotrichosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 19: 507–509.
  25. 25. Gutierrez-Galhardo MC, Schubach AO, Barros MBL, Moita-Blanco TC, Cuzzi-Maya T, et al. (2002) Erythema nodosum associated with sporotrichosis. Int J Dermatol 41: 114–116.
  26. 26. Freitas DFS, Valle ACF, Cuzzi T, Brandao LG, Zancope-Oliveira RM, et al. (2012) Sweet syndrome associated with sporotrichosis. Br J Dermatol 166: 212–213.
  27. 27. Barros MBL, Schubach AO, Oliveira RVC, Martins EB, Teixeira JL, et al. (2011) Treatment of cutaneous sporotrichosis with itraconazole - study of 645 patients. Clin Infect Dis 52: e200–206.
  28. 28. Arsura EL, Kilgore WB, Ratnayake SN (1998) Erythema nodosum in pregnant patients with coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis 27: 1201–1203.
  29. 29. Carlos IZ, Sassa MF, Sgarbi DBG, Placeres MC, Maia DC (2009) Current research on the immune response to experimental sporotrichosis. Mycopathologia 168: 1–10.

0 Replies to “Research Paper Sporotrichosis”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *